Stay-Order (10)
| Date | Circular | Tags | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SAT has stayed the one-year debarment of Jitendra Hasmukhlal Vyas, originally imposed by SEBI for trading activities in DU Digital … | |||||||||||||||
SAT has stayed the one-year debarment of Jitendra Hasmukhlal Vyas, originally imposed by SEBI for trading activities in DU Digital Technologies Limited, subject to payment of 50% penalty. The entity has since paid Rs. 5,00,000 to SEBI.
| |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has admitted Appeal No. 32 of 2026 filed by Vyas Jitendrakumar Hasmukhlal HUF against SEBI's one-year … | |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) has admitted Appeal No. 32 of 2026 filed by Vyas Jitendrakumar Hasmukhlal HUF against SEBI's one-year debarment order, granting a stay subject to deposit of 50% of the penalty amount within four weeks.
| |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal grants conditional stay on SEBI's one-year debarment order against Vyas Jitendrakumar Hasmukhlal HUF, subject … | |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal grants conditional stay on SEBI's one-year debarment order against Vyas Jitendrakumar Hasmukhlal HUF, subject to deposit of 50% of penalty amount within four weeks, in connection with trading activities in Du Digital Technologies Limited (now Du Digital Global Limited).
| |||||||||||||||
SAT has stayed the one-year debarment of Vyas Jitendrakumar Hasmukhlal HUF in the matter of trading activities in DU Digital Technologies … | |||||||||||||||
SAT has stayed the one-year debarment of Vyas Jitendrakumar Hasmukhlal HUF in the matter of trading activities in DU Digital Technologies Limited, subject to deposit of 50% of the Rs. 5,00,000 penalty, which has since been paid to SEBI.
| |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal admits appeal by Vyas Jitendrakumar Hasmukhlal HUF against SEBI, granting conditional stay on one-year … | |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal admits appeal by Vyas Jitendrakumar Hasmukhlal HUF against SEBI, granting conditional stay on one-year debarment subject to deposit of 50% of penalty amount within four weeks.
| |||||||||||||||
SAT stayed SEBI order against Sandeep Ghate and Instafin Financial Advisors LLP subject to 50% penalty deposit in Droneacharya Aerial … | |||||||||||||||
SAT stayed SEBI order against Sandeep Ghate and Instafin Financial Advisors LLP subject to 50% penalty deposit in Droneacharya Aerial Innovations IPO manipulation case.
| |||||||||||||||
SAT grants partial stay on SEBI debarment order for Sandeep Ghate and Instafin Financial Advisors LLP after 50% penalty deposit. Trading and … | |||||||||||||||
SAT grants partial stay on SEBI debarment order for Sandeep Ghate and Instafin Financial Advisors LLP after 50% penalty deposit. Trading and market access restrictions temporarily lifted pending appeal.
| |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal grants partial stay on SEBI order against Decipher Labs Ltd, requiring 50% deposit of disgorgement and penalty … | |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal grants partial stay on SEBI order against Decipher Labs Ltd, requiring 50% deposit of disgorgement and penalty amount while staying certain business restrictions.
| |||||||||||||||
SAT has stayed SEBI's market access restriction on Decipher Labs Ltd, allowing the company to continue securities market activities while … | |||||||||||||||
SAT has stayed SEBI's market access restriction on Decipher Labs Ltd, allowing the company to continue securities market activities while appeal is pending.
| |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal stays SEBI debarment order against Man Industries India Limited and its officials, directing deposit of 50% … | |||||||||||||||
Securities Appellate Tribunal stays SEBI debarment order against Man Industries India Limited and its officials, directing deposit of 50% penalty amount.
| |||||||||||||||